The two shames of the last Barça Assembly

The Barça member did what he had to do in the last Assembly of delegates. Vote yes to everything and give confidence to the board so that with the sale of up to 49.9% of BLM and up to 25% of the audiovisual rights of the League for 25 years, they will have enough money to revive the club. We will no longer insist, with which the partner votes blindly, without knowing the amounts or the names of the companies with which they are going to marry, but I will denounce the times that the democratic shame of the telematic Assemblies is necessary.

With the excuse that more people can vote, the debate is much smaller and the mass is silenced. A demonstration. Josep Manrubia Feitomember 17,503, was the only Barcelona fan who had a question for The door by videoconference. The only one, in five hours of meeting. Barça has more than 140,000 members, it is represented by 3,437 compromising members and, in the face of two crucial asset sales, a single hero asked to speak from home. Had it been in person, the board would have had to answer no fewer than 25 questions per topic. Instead, with only the senators present in the room, they just ask Minguella, Rovira and an unknown partner. Apart, of course, from Gaspart y Reyna of palm trees

The second fact to mourn is that neither among the senators, nor among those who sent questions in writing in the previous days, nor by videoconference, not a single woman intervened. Not a single partner in five hours. I don’t want to think they’re not engaged. I simply sense that they do not agree with this meeting format of Jan Palomo. Face-to-face meetings, please.

read also