Santiago Pedraz sentences Esther Doña: “I will never go back to her and I will not talk to her”

The photographic report that accompanied the false announcement of marriage between Santiago Pedraz y Esther Dona it was made a month before it was published the famous cover of Hola. It was on July 24 in Menorca and the interview was completed on August 9, that is, two weeks before it came to light. When the edition was closed, everything was over but the widow of the Marquis of Griñon she hid it from the publication, despite the fact that her ex-boyfriend had asked her to tell the truth to the weekly. The rupture at that point was definitive: they had been separated for two weeks.

Also read: Four weddings and a fortune: why Esther Doña is still silent in the jacuzzi (and kept the exclusive that she was getting married again)

Last Monday, August 22, when the weekly closed the edition, the widow of the Marquis of Griñón was informed by the magazine to which she had sold the exclusive that the engagement would hit the newsstands that same Wednesday. Esther Doña had already definitively broken her relationship with the judge, but she did not notify the publication and let it come out. “No communication that nothing had changed between them,” a lie by concealment of the former wife of Carlos Falcó that corroborates the publication itself this Wednesday, with an opinion article that accompanies the obligatory explanations exposed in this issue.




But, since the relationship between the magistrate and the former model had ended almost two weeks before it was published that they were getting married, on the same Wednesday 24 Santiago Pedraz It didn’t take long to get in touch with Hola: “I broke off the relationship on August 12,” said the magistrate, confirming what we have been publishing these days. “Since then, absolute distance”, the man from Salamanca reaffirmed himself by phone and was very “amazed”, according to the weekly. “There are red lines that cannot be crossed. Esther crossed them and that is why I stood up and broke,” the judge declared.







Esther negotiated with the magazine

Santiago Pedraz has not been paid now or ever for any report that was agreed between Hola and Esther Doña, who kept quiet about what happened, hid the truth of their breakup from the publication and therefore prevented the weekly from aborting the publication of that cover or at least postponing it.

Santiago Pedraz He asked Esther Doña not to release those photos or that interview, but Esther did not tell the magazine anything and decided to go ahead. The explanation given by the widowed Marchioness of Griñón to the weekly is that she was just another row and that in a few days they would be “as happy as ever”, as she explains. Hola. Esther even told the magazine that nothing was happening and that there was no such break: “Stay calm, in a few days, it will be fixed and we will be as good as ever,” the publication insists.

After Santiago Pedraz explained to Hola that he was no longer with Esther, once the magazine was on the newsstands with what was a lie like a cathedral, if not to say a joke, that was when the aristocrat’s ex insisted on that “Stay calm, in a few days it will be is going to fix it”, but finally he had to admit that, indeed, Santiago Pedraz had broken off their relationship and therefore cancelled, their wedding, through a WhatsApp message.

The publication wonders if Esther wanted to force Santiago to come to terms with the pressure of publishing the report or if he hoped that everything would be solved without consequences. Esther, as we had assumed, had not received any money for the interview at that time, then the publication discards the economic motive.

Esther Doña, branded “irresponsible”

The magazine says that Esther Doña, whatever her reasons were, “acted irresponsibly” because Pedraz “had it very clear at that time and still has it,” the publication maintains. “I’m not going to go back to Esther. I don’t want to talk to her,” the magistrate asserts forcefully. “I will never speak ill of her because I do not want to harm her in any way, but there are red lines that cannot be crossed and she crossed them. That’s why I stood up and broke and that’s why I’m not going to move,” he says. The magistrate responded to her friends when they called him to congratulate him the same: “We’re not together anymore” repeated.

comments1WhatsAppWhatsAppFacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterLinkedinlinkedin