A month and a half after the Judge Alejandra Gilof the Court of Instruction 13 of Barcelona, will order the file and the dismissal of the complaint that the businessman Jaume Roures y Mediaproduction SLU presented against the former president of Barça, Josep Maria Bartomeuand his adviser Jaume Masferrer for possible slander and insults in relation to the case ‘Barçagate’the same magistrate has now dismissed the appeal filed by Roures himself, in an order dated May 19.
The audiovisual producer accused them of crimes against honor for accusations through the Twitter account @JaumedeTerror2 and on Facebook through the JaumeUnFilmdeTerror account, created by I3 Venturesa company contracted by the Barça to monitor social networks and the image that was given in them of the club, its president, the board and the team.
The magistrate now justifies her decision to dismiss the appeal filed by Oaks in that “to integrate the crime of slander, generic accusations are not enough. It is essential that they be so specific and conclusive that, basically, they contain the elements required to define the attributed crime (SSTS of October 16, 1981 or November 17, 1987) and in the case at hand, the accusations made against the plaintiff are mostly generic and lack the elements that qualify the crime of slander, since it is necessary to impute a crime […]”. “Because of the foregoing, criminal proceedings are not adequate to resolve this conflict before us and the plaintiff has other means at her disposal to preserve her right to honor. In the rest, which is somehow irrelevant because the facts are not typical, it must be reasoned in the third reasoning about the absence of indications of the participation of those investigated in those facts, “concludes the judge to end by noting that” dismissed the motion for reform filed by the Attorney Ms. Nel·lo on behalf of Jaume Roures y Mediaproduction SLU against the resolution, auto, dated 1/4/22″.
read also