The VAR is again in the spotlight after the Valencia statement in which it attacks this technology. Rodrigo's goal annulled against Real Madrid for offside interference, which was warned from the VOR room, has been the trigger for the ches. Following this controversy, We analyze which teams have been the most 'benefited' and 'harmed' by the use of this tool.
The teams that have lived the most against decisions as a consequence of an intervention of the VAR son Mallorca (8), Valencia (7) and Celta, Real Sociedad, Alavés, Sevilla, and Betis (6). I would follow with 5 Real Madrid, Barcelona, Atlético, Osasuna and Getafe. Athletic, Espanyol, Eibar, Villarreal, Valladolid would have four decisions against and Levante and Leganés three. The least 'affected' by the video arbitration corrections would be Granada, with two.
In the opposite direction, the most benefited by the corrections of this tool would be Sevilla (9), Atlético, Athletic and Osasuna (7). With 6 interventions in favor are Eibar, Espanyol and Granada. Celta, Alavés, Villarreal, Valladolid and Betis would accumulate five; while Real Madrid, Real Sociedad, Levante and Getafe four. The least benefited are Barcelona and Leganés (3), Mallorca (2) and Valencia (1).
Atlético, which is the one that has experienced the use of this tool the most times (14), he has seen how they have conceded two goals, three penalties and they have shown two red cards to their rivals; instead the VAR annulled them both a penalty and awarded their opponents three maximum penalties. As for goals, Villarreal is the one that has been validated the most goals (4) and Madrid and Mallorca have been the most voided (3). In the penalties chapter, Athletic have been pointed out, with the help of the VAR, five; instead Alavés is the team that video arbitration has awarded the most penalties to its opponents (4).