We already tell that Daniel Sancho’s lawyers study Death in Thailand: The true story between Daniel Sancho and Edwin Arrieta. The 240 -page work was published last Wednesday, January 22 and ensures, among other things, that the murder of Edwin Arrieta was premeditated and that the mobile was economical.
Rodolfo Sancho’s legal team – formed by Marcos García Montes, Carmen Balfagón and Ramón Chipirrás – is very angry and, as advanced LecturesThey study to take legal measures for the statements made by fields. They advanced: “You will have to demonstrate everything you said”.
In an interview with Sports Worldthe author has lashed out against them, ensuring that “No one else has dared” To tell what he exposes in his book about the case. He says he publishes it by “For the monetary possibility” Because he works as a freelance, but adds: “I’ve gotten fully in the case. I wanted to get to the end and there are still things,”. And it reaffirms: “They want to complain. I have important things that surely do not want them to come to light.”.
On the other hand, although it does not go further, he says he also publishes the book “For security issues”: “In some cases it has to do with security. The issue of money is to have how I can finish it so that it does not affect me, nothing more. “And leave in the air: “What I am not going to do is get into a mess with more dangerous people (I do not speak of Spain now) “. And it defends: “I have no concern. The concern is to waste money and lawyers”. In this sense, he says that the warnings of undertaking legal measures against him only favor his book: “They are clumsy again”.
And on the case, add: “Here the essential is what happened, explain why”. And attacks Daniel Sancho’s legal team: “Then the lawyers have failed, they have lost their strategy and that must be said in the book”. Also attack against television programs that according to him have “bleached” the murder and dismembered: “Even after the sentence, it is the major shame”.
Thus, Campos himself defines himself as follows: “I do not have the journalism career and it is a shame that I am the person who is being the flag bearer of this case”. And it reaffirms: “You have to tell the truth, what you don’t have to do is cover it”.
The author also wonders the real reason why Rodolfo made a documentary talking about his son while the sentence was not yet known. Something that, as explained by his defense, did for money: “Why was a calamitous documentary made? What are the expenses? Although first travel do you spend that money”.
And add: “We have the right to know what happens. If you really need money, why don’t you go to a set? In the case of Marcos [García-Montes] I think because he is a little tied to him. In any guild, project or business when the goals are not achieved to the responsible persons. It is clear that the sentence is not what they expected. So why do they continue? There is something. I imagine it, I intuit it. “
In spite of everything, Joaqún Campos does point out in favor of Rodolfo: “Daniel has sunk the life of his parents, as sad. That the father shows a chulesca attitude does not mean that he is sunk inside. It is a disaster what your child has done. “
Joaquín Campos and Los Sancho
The confrontation between Campos and Sancho’s defense comes from afar. The journalist was one of the guests to talk about the crime of Edwin Arrieta in various Spanish media and starred in a live rifirrafe with Carmen Balfagón. For example, in the program Mañanerosof TVE: “There is no that money that Joaquín says, there was no economic mobile. I hope Mr. Joaquín Campos, if he has it, teach it too, because he is already well talking without teaching anything,” he said very angry.
The journalist, however, did not remain silent: “It is a part that I take for the book and when read it will understand it very well, but apart from this a person who has been lying, confusing and misrepresenting since he took part of Daniel Sancho’s defense. “
LinkedinBeloud