“We don’t have budgets, Puigdemont is going to return to Spain, it’s a complete disaster and we’re talking about Ayuso’s boyfriend. I just don’t understand it. It really can’t be compared”. This is how the Marchioness of Griñón has begun her defense of the president of the Community of Madrid, protagonist of the political gathering in The Anthill this Thursday. For Tamara Falcothe latest news about boyfriend Isabel Diaz Ayusoaccused of two tax crimes and another of document falsification, are not so important: “They are getting us to talk about this issue when it only concerns Ayuso’s boyfriend and Ayuso.”
Isabel Preysler’s daughter has confronted her table companions (Nuria Roca, Juan del Val and Cristina Pardo) to stand up for the leader of the PP in the midst of controversy: “It would be very different if it is your husband. With a boyfriend it is more complicated to ask him. The point of intimacy is not the same when you are a boyfriend as when you are married”Tamara said. “Maybe you’re in a relationship and you don’t know everything about the other person.”, has finished. The Marchioness knows a lot about all this, since she herself suffered in her flesh the double life of the man who had been her boyfriend for three years until he became her fiancé. A few weeks after getting engaged, Iñigo Onieva’s infidelities came to light and Tamara ended their relationship.
The marchioness’s fierce defense did not stop there: “Is Ayuso’s address that apartment? Is it his tax address?”, commented on the penthouse that Alberto González Amador acquired last summer for almost 900,000 euros and to which the president moved shortly after. “But if he can live wherever he wants, it would be more necessary, but being who he is, he has to be clear that everything is legal,” Del Val replied.
“The story is not only whether she has intervened or not, it is also whether she enjoys certain things in her daily life by being with this man, whether everything has a clean origin,” commented Pardo. “What you say about ‘They’re getting it’ is the problem of getting on one side. They don’t give me false invoices. You can’t do things permanently like I like Ayuso better than Sánchez…”, added Juan, who Then he tried to reduce the tension in the moment: “I’m not saying that’s your case, Tamara.”
Six sentences for history
– “The point of intimacy is not the same when you are a boyfriend as when you are married.”
– “The accounts have not been approved, Puigdemont returns, eh, come on, a complete disaster, and we are giving time to Ayuso’s boyfriend? I just don’t understand it.”
– “They are getting us to talk about this issue when it only concerns Ayuso’s boyfriend and Ayuso.”
– “It would be very different if it is your husband, with a boyfriend it is more complicated to ask him.”
– “Is Ayuso’s address that apartment? Is it his tax address?”
– “Maybe you’re in a relationship and you don’t know everything about the other person.”
LinkedinBeloud