The rojiblancos claimed a penalty from Casemiro to Morata. Futre: “Theft of the penalty will be used for the new season of La Casa de Papel”
Morata, at the time of Casemiro's alleged penalty.
-
Chronicle
Benzema decides
-
Derby
Bernabu's guasa with Simeone and the 'mourinhista' curse broken by Zidane
The play happened mediated the first part, in full moment of dominion of the Attic of Madrid. In the 31st minuteCasemiro knocked down Morata inside the area, but Estrada Fernndez did not signal a penalty.
It was practically the only controversy of a party that changed completely after the break and the changes of Zidane. Felipe could be expelled after a hard entry when he already had a yellow card.
However, from the club rojiblanco protested about the alleged penalty. Your president, Enrique Cerezo, cried against arbitration and against the VAR, which did not consider it appropriate to take action. “There has been no justice or clarity,” I said in Movistar's microphones. “It was a clear penalty. The VAR is for justice and clarity.” The central Felipe was also clear: “I was very far from the play and I saw that it was a penalty.”
Simeone, on the other hand, did not want to enter the controversy: “I did not see anything. There is the VAR, the referee, the room, the line … There are a lot of people to comment. The truth that I did not see it” .
Cerezo also pronounced on the frustrated signing of Edinson Cavani: “I think it's a shame and I don't want to point anyone out, but I think it's a shame about the situations of some players with their representatives and family members. The subject has not been inflated, it has been superinflated and we are not here to be robbed and do anything strange. “
Before, the former rojiblanco player Paulo Futre, burst on their social networks: “The theft of the penalty from Casemiro to Morata has been so great that they will use it for the new season of La Casa de Papel. FLIPO that the VAR says nothing,” he wrote, attaching an ironic image .
According to the criteria of