“I’m ruined. I have lost everything”. These were the words of Ivonne Reyes on the cover of the magazine Lectures. The one who was a television muse in the 90s is presented to the spectators, twenty years later, as a vulnerable woman who does not even have to eat.
“I have had to borrow ten euros to buy food. I am in psychiatric treatment. From the pandemic, I broke. I was about to die from a septicemia and, since then, it has been difficult to trace. I felt broken, without illusion or energy. I have had to host the law of the second chance“He confessed.
During all this time, Two people have been his main support: his sister and son Alejandro Reyeswho, after studying dramatic art outside Spain, now seeks an opportunity to debut as an actor in the country. Meanwhile, he works as a waiter, and with that money he has helped his mother in what he has been able to. However, now that a new income route for Ivonne has opened, perhaps the young man can focus on his career.
But that situation has changed radically. As he has learned Informaliaafter telling his story in the magazine Lectures and sit in Friday, Ivonne has managed to pocket around 60,000 euros. An quantity not negligible and within the reach of very few, which will allow you to stay for a season. Only for your speech In the program presented by Bea Archidona and Santi Acosta, he charged 50,000 euroswhile the rest of the amount has been paid by the publication.
Until now, Ivonne was very difficult to find work on television or magazines. She talks about a “black hand” and points directly against Pepe Navarrowith whom he has maintained a contentious for more than fifteen years for the fatherhood of his son, Alejandro.
Ivonne took Pepe to the courts to force him to undergo paternity test, but the presenter of Tonight we cross the Mississippi He refused. As a consequence, justice awarded him the legal paternity of the young man. A decision that, according to many, was a mistake by Navarro and which, apparently, deeply regrets.
The presenter argues that, after subsequently performing a genetic test, Alejandro is not his child, regardless of what the legal documents establish. He is determined to prove it, although, judicially, if Ivonne or Alejandro do not agree to undergo a new test, it will be absolutely impossible to prove it.
