The exfutbolista of the FC Barcelona Samuel Eto’o and his former agent Jose Maria Mesalles They have accepted this Monday the sentences of 22 months and one year in prison, respectively, after acknowledging having defrauded 3,872,621 euros to the public estatebetween 2006 and 2009.
In his statement in the Criminal Court number 11 of Barcelona, Eto’o has admitted the fraud but has blamed it, without citing him directly, to Mesalleswhom he has always defined as “a second father”.
In fact, the Cameroonian former footballer He sued his former representative for alleged crimes of fraud and misappropriation in the management of his assets, a matter that is still in the investigation phase.
“I recognize the facts and I am going to pay, but let it be known that I was a child then and that I always did what my father asked me to do,” he said. Samuel Eto’o.
Eto’o, with Mesalles when he was his representative
Mesallesfor his part, has preferred not to testify before admitting the facts, in a conformity trial in which the third defendant, Jesus Ballastadministrator of one of the instrumental companies used in the fraud, has been acquitted.
In its indictment, the prosecution requested sentences of 4 years and 6 months in prison for Eto’o and Mesalles that finally have been left in 22 months for the former player, as the author of four crimes against the Public Treasury, and one year for his former agent as a necessary cooperator.
Likewise, former African striker He has been sentenced to pay four fines, one for each crime, amounting to 1,810,310 euros, and his former representative to another four for a total value of 905,155 euros.
The sentences, whose execution will be suspended since neither of them has a criminal record, have been mitigated by the Public Prosecutor’s Office by recognizing both the facts and having partially repaired the damage with the return of part of the defrauded fees.
The events that have been tried today in the City of Justice occurred between 2006 and 2009, years in which Samuel Eto’o obtained significant income from the transfer of its image rights to the sports brand Puma and FC Barcelona, which should have been taxed as income from movable capital in their personal income tax returns, but which the footballer did not declare.
Eto’o pretended that such rights had been transferred to two companies resident in Hungary and Spain, so that the income diverted to the Hungarian company, managed by barkdid not pay taxes to the Treasury, while those diverted to the Spanish company, administered by Mesallesthey did so at a rate much lower than that corresponding to personal income tax.
read also