The psychiatrist José Carlos Fuertes It has been expanded on Daniel Sancho: “His skill with knives is more than proven“, he says. José Carlos Fuertes, forensic psychiatrist, has analyzed the murder of Edwin Arrieta, stating that it is possible to dismembered”to a person in three hours“.
The forensic psychiatrist starts from the main video the murder of Edwin Arrieta and the arrest of Daniel Sancho, of which he recalled that it is “A kitchen professional” and “Your skill with knives and to cut certain elements is more than proven“In addition, Fueres insists that it is possible to dismembered “A person in three hours“.
However, the psychiatrist also remembers that it was “assuming that he has killed in his full judgment“.
But not: “I don’t have it so clear. I think it is absolutely necessary to make a very detailed psychiatric and psychological report, and that cannot be done in eight days“.
On the possibility that Daniel Sancho could have taken drugs, he reflects: “How long have they taken to collect the sample? Has an adequate chain of custody been stipulated? We do not know if it is attributable because an expert may appear to say that the basic imputability conditions are not met“. At the moment, there is already a lack of prospering appeals, justice has condemned Daniel Sancho to life Edwin Arrieta
Daniel Sancho, a cook’s ability and hell of his fall
Daniel Sancho meets his conviction every day in his own hell on earth. Thailand’s heat is oppressive. It sneaks into the lungs and weighs in the mood. In a corner of Koh Samui prison, Daniel Sancho lives the longest days of his existence. He is Rodolfo Sancho’s son, a Spanish celebrity, but here, on this exotic island that promised adventures and pleasures, his name does not shine. Here is a man with the weight of a crime that overflows understanding. In his cell, away from his land and his past life, he faces the future: a life imprisonment that neither the best lawyers nor the desperate screams of his family could avoid.
The case is already known everywhere. Daniel Sancho, chef by profession, traveled to Thailand looking for something that he could not explain himself. Maybe adventure, maybe an escape from his routine. There, in the golden sands of Koh Samui, he met Edwin Arrieta, a Colombian plastic surgeon with whom he had developed a close relationship. What happened next was the beginning of a descent that would shatter his life.
In August 2023, Sancho was arrested by the brutal murder of Arrieta. The chef confessed to having killed and dismembered the surgeon after an argument. As he declared, he acted in a start of fury, but the details of the crime left everyone without words. The images of security cameras showed Sancho buying knives, plastic bags and cleaning products. Police found remains of the Arrieta body scattered in different parts of the island. A meticulous, methodical work, carried out with a coldness that bristled the skin.
Forensic psychiatrist José Carlos Fuertes now offers a disturbing vision about the case. “Sancho is a kitchen professional. His skill with knives is more than proven“, he says. According to Fuertes, the dismembered of the Arrieta body could have been carried out in just three hours. Three hours to destroy a life and bury any trace of humanity. But beyond the technique, the psychiatrist poses uncomfortable questions: Did Sancho acted under the effects of drugs?
The trial: fast justice, eternal doubts
In Thailand, justice does not go with rodeos. In less than a year, Daniel Sancho was sentenced to life imprisonment. In Spain, the news caused a stir. Many questioned the speed of the judicial process, while others argued that the verdict is fair and proportionate to the seriousness of the crime. However, the shadows of the irregularities raised quickly.
José Carlos Fuertes, when analyzing the case, indicates the importance of making a exhaustive psychiatric and psychological report, something that does not seem to have been done with the necessary time. “He is taking himself for granted that he has killed in his full judgment. I don’t have it so clear“, declares the psychiatrist, opening the door to the possibility that Sancho was not completely responsible for his actions. Although in his first statements the chef showed an apparent calm and coldness, his subsequent acts and confession could suggest an altered mental state .
The resource presented by Sancho’s defense was rejected. The lawyers appealed to the Spanish system, asking that Daniel could serve his sentence in his country of origin, but so far, negotiations between Spain and Thailand have not paid off. In his cell, Sancho only has time, infinite and cruel, to contemplate the turns of his destiny.
The hell of a Thai prison
Thai prisons are not like Europe. There are no comforts, there are no breath. The cells are crowded, with more than thirty men sharing a space that barely gives for ten. Heat and humidity are incessant, and food, a minimum ration of rice and soup, does not satisfy the most modest of stomachs. Diseases such as dengue and tuberculosis are common. Every day is a struggle for survival, and Daniel Sancho knows it.
It is said that Sancho has tried to adapt to the prison routine. Participate in activities organized by the guards, such as physical exercises and workshops, but cultural and linguistic isolation keep it section. It is a stranger in a place where solidarity among inmates is the only way to support the load. His family visits it whenever he can, but the visits are brief, guarded, sometimes add more weight to the pain of knowing that the return home is, in the best case, a distant dream.
Psychological pressure is huge. According to some reports, Sancho has lost weight and its mood oscillates between resignation and despair. His mother’s letters, the messages of support of friends and family, barely manage to break the loneliness barrier that surrounds him. In that corner of the world, surrounded by walls that seem to absorb all hope, Sancho is nothing more than a man facing the consequences of his actions.
Daniel Sancho’s case has raised a debate that goes beyond crime itself. What leads a seemingly normal man to commit such an atrocious act? Was it a moment of madness, an outburst fed by anger and fear? Or is it something darker, an inherent capacity for violence that was activated in the worst circumstances?
Psychiatrists and criminologists have tried to unravel Sancho’s mind, but the answers are not clear. The link with Edwin Arrieta seems to have been complicated, full of tensions and possibly manipulation. Some suggest that Sancho felt trapped, that his relationship with Arrieta pushed him to the limit. Others see in the young chef a man with a normal mask that hid a disturbing capacity for coldness.
What is true is that the case of Sancho raises broader questions about justice, guilt and redemption. In a judicial system as relentless as the Thai, is it possible that a crucial diagnosis has been overlooked? Was there any indication of mental illness, some trigger that could have changed the course of events? These questions, like the images of security cameras and recorded confessions, are now part of a closed file.
Daniel Sancho has in front of him an entire life of confinement. The possibility of a condemnation reduction depends on uncertain factors: prison behavior, the time elapsed, negotiations between governments. But even if he managed to return to Spain someday, stigma will always accompany him. His name will be forever linked to a crime that shocked the world, and his previous life, that of the young chef with a promising future, will remain as a distant memory.
In Thailand, the days are long, heat is unbearable, and hope is a luxury that few can afford. For Daniel Sancho, each dawn is a reminder of the decision that made that fateful night. An act that, in three hours, changed the two -lives course forever. Now, the only thing left is the weight of guilt, the silence of his cell and the echo of a name that no longer has the brightness before. In this corner of the world, surrounded by the noise of the world that continues to turn, Sancho faces his punishment. He is a broken man, a life in pause, and a reminder that even the most terrible acts have a human face.
LinkedinBeloud