Matchday 35 has been one of the busiest in terms of VAR since his arrival at LaLiga. Up to ten interventions of the technology, equaling the record of irruptions in the same weekend. In La Cerámica he appeared four times and in Di Stéfano two. Being in this last scenario where a great debate was created. Some clubs complain of being more disadvantaged than benefited by this tool. In total, the VAR accumulates 146 interventions so far in the league.
The teams that most times have experienced a VAR intervention have been Villarreal (24), Valencia (20) and Eibar (20). At the opposite pole are Huesca (8), Athletic (9) and Osasuna (9). The real Madrid, for his part, accumulates 16 interventions in total, the same as Atlético, but more than Barcelona (11). It should be taken into account that in this report the interventions are divided into three types: in favor, against and does not influence. In this last section, identity errors are counted (unless they involve a second yellow for a player) and the occasions in which the referee does not follow the recommendation of the VAR.
VAR interventions by team
| TOTAL | IN FAVOR | AGAINST | NOT INFLUENCED | |
| Real Madrid | 16 | 5 | 9 | two |
| Barcelona | eleven | 3 | 6 | two |
| Athletic | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Celtic | 13 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
| Athletic | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Real society | 12 | 6 | 4 | two |
| Eibar | twenty | eleven | 8 | 1 |
| Alaves | 17 | 9 | 5 | 3 |
| Osasuna | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Elche | 17 | eleven | 4 | two |
| Huesca | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Valencia | twenty | eleven | 7 | two |
| Villarreal | 24 | eleven | eleven | two |
| I raised | 16 | 8 | 6 | two |
| Valladolid | eleven | 5 | 6 | 0 |
| grenade | 13 | 4 | 7 | two |
| Seville | fifteen | 7 | 8 | 0 |
| Betis | 18 | 7 | 9 | two |
| Cadiz | 14 | two | eleven | 1 |
| Getafe | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 |
In section the most favored by decision changes at the request of the VAR are Villarreal, Valencia, Eibar and Elche, all with 11. Among the least attractive are Cádiz (2), Celta (3) and Barcelona (3). The white team has been favored by technology on five occasions and the rojiblancos on seven. Villarreal and Cádiz are, on the other hand, the teams with the most video refereeing performances against them. Both with 11. They would be followed in the ranking by Real Madrid (9, which rises positions after the two decisions taken in yesterday's game against Sevilla), Betis (9) and Eibar (8). The least punished by this tool is Huesca, with three.
Specifying the cases in which the VAR can enter, in goals, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Real Sociedad and Sevilla are the teams that have been annulled the most (3), while Atlético and Getafe have conceded the most (2). But if we focus on the goals disallowed against an opponent, Eibar has been the most graceful (5), ahead of Alavés and Valencia (4). Regarding penalties: Villarreal is the most graceful, since they have been whistled up to 9 in favor at the request of the VAR (seven of them transformed by Gerard Moreno). Atlético, for example, is the most aggrieved in this regard, since it is the one that has been annulled the most (3), next to Cádiz (3). But Madrid is also aggrieved in terms of penalties, but in those awarded to the rival at the behest of technology. Up to four have been whistled against him, the same as against Celta, Villarreal and Cádiz. Only Granada surpasses them (5 against). The most benefited because they have annulled penalties to his rival is Elche (6).