Valladolid asks the “unification of criteria in Spanish arbitration” to achieve competitive “equality”

MADRID, 17 Mar. (EUROPA PRESS) –

Real Valladolid criticized the arbitration on his 0-1 defeat against RC Celta this Saturday for a penalty by Javi Sánchez that the Collegiate García Verdura pointed out in the José Zorrilla stadium, notice of Figueroa Vázquez from the VAR room through, so they requested in a statement that “the unification of criteria in the Spanish arbitration is a reality” to reach the “equality.

“After what happened in Saturday’s match in Zorrilla, from Real Valladolid we have shared as a club a reflection with the Technical Referees Committee (CTA), with the Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF), with LaLiga and with all the levels of the world of football, in order to contribute to the sports improvement of the competition and the conditions of equality among all the participants in the same,” said the entity on their website. “

The Valladolid confessed that they “surprised that the calling for the collegiate by the VAR was carried out in a condition under the formula ‘Review a hand’ that is contrary to the usual ‘review play’ and the spirit of the video carbitraje”, a tool that they understand from the club is “helpful and not of condition prior to the referee.”

“It is evident that advancing in the request for revision The solution is not a guarantee for it to be carried out in conditions of maximum objectivity,” added the statement of the Blanquivioleta team, after the defeat by 0-1 before the Celta RC for a penalty by Javi Sánchez.

Given this, the club regretted “the absence of different planes from different cameras in the revision of the controversial play.” “That combination of several positions in the study of this type of plays is not only the usual, but it is a guarantee of help for the referee who has to make the final decision,” said the text.

“To the extent that these analyzes can occur from the highest possible level of information, the result of them will always be more objective, less debatable and, therefore, better,” the club was advised to the arbitral estate.

Finally, Real Valladolid claimed that “the unification of criteria in Spanish arbitration is a reality and not a proclamation lacking reality in time.” “Only by setting clear criteria, keeping them stable over time and universalizing their application we can offer all professionals (players, referees and committees) enough tools to develop their work in a scenario of stability and objectivity,” the entity defended.

“The Real Valladolid maintains a clear commitment to the constant improvement of the competition, with the collaboration between players, referees, clubs and organizers as well as with the demand for objectivity and transparency that reinforces everyone’s confidence in a satisfactory development of our sport,” the statement concluded.