The debate we always return: is it worth everything for the audience? Does Mediaset are entitled to pay an alleged abuser to win viewers and reduce the screen share of a rival chain; even with testimonies of little reliability? Until just a week, he was a great stranger. However, Joaquín’s former brother -in -law, José Saborido, He has taken advantage of the controversy raised by the statements of the adult actress Claudia Bavel About the former Betis player to make box. José Saborido is the tool that Mediaset uses to damage Joaquín, star of Atresmedia, and is willing to say anything for money. But we are facing a “piece” capable of telling anything if the check is large.
José Saborido It is not that type of person you would buy a used car. But Mediaset does not mind giving voice to people without morality or principles in order to make audience and subtract points from their competition. And that’s why he is paying this character: to hurt Joaquín. It doesn’t matter that what he says mixes free disqualifications, truths or lies. The chain had been looking for a personal or family crack for a while to destroy the image of former Bético Joaquín and his wife, success stars in Antena 3 programs such as The Captain in America. They are spaces that make a lot of pupa to Telecinco in prime time. Therefore, the meat choppy machine that is Friday It has been the battlefield chosen to pour the former footballer.
José Saborido is a doll in the hands of money: in exchange for his currency bag he has decided to launch himself to fame and, incidentally, earn money. According to himself he has let his sister know, Susana Saborido – as Joaquín, ” 50,000 euros has been pocketed for sitting in Friday, The program presented by Bea Archidona and Santi Acosta. In that space, he lashed out at the marriage, which he described as farce. “My sister is aware of everything, but prefers money to a happy marriage,” he said.
Given these statements, Joaquín and his wife have been forced to issue a statement that we already collected: They announce legal measures against those who threaten their intimacy and honor. In that message they include José, with whom they have not maintained just a relationship for several years. The break with the character that Mediaset uses to destroy Joaquin was due to a problem between his sister -in -law Nadine and Susana. However, Joseph’s history has not facilitated the relationship between the brothers. In their youth, Joaquín and José shared the same circle of friends and went out together for Seville, but, today, the footballer and his wife do not even know the young children of José, who he has with Nadine, 5 and 9 years old.
A history dotted with complaints of scams and ill -treatment
According to documentation in the possession of this newspaper, José Saborido drags a history full of accusations, ranging from the scam to the ill -treatment. In 2009, he was accused of improper appropriation of a vehicle and fraud. Ten years later, in February 2019, his current wife and mother of his two children, Nadine, filed several complaints for gender violence against him.
Joaquin’s brother -in -law is not saved:
Dynamite marriage with Susana Saborido and claims to have witnessed infidelities until the very day her daughter was born.
? #Deviernes
? https://t.co/0SLWhrGryv pic.twitter.com/z0YwsFboOB– de Viernes (@deviernestv) February 28, 2025
After a separate time, José initiated a relationship with another woman, Ana Belén Faura, Who, in November 2023, also denounced him for ill -treatment. As if that were not enough, in 2024 he went through the dungeons again, this time accused of illegal detention and threats. In addition, less than a month ago, it was evicted from a property by a judicial requirement.
The notice before your television interview
In the Mediaset program, there was something that, with certainty, José did not lied: he warned his sister that he was going to television to talk about her and her husband. He did it through his mother, as we have confirmed. “They give me 50,000 euros for going to TV to talk about your daughter’s infidelities. I have been many things throughout these years, but they are insisting a lot. I just ask that, if my sister really does not want me to go, to call me on the phone, “he knows that he said, several sources confirm.
Family sources tell us what this character says outside the character to which Telecinco hires without taking into account that they are giving voice to a person denounced on more than one occasion by abuser. “They know how hurt and upset that I am because they don’t know my children or because they have seen them twice in their lives. My children don’t know who they are. Joaquin hasn’t even called me to ask me how I am after the heart attack I had. My sister went to the hospital, yes, but later, not a call to know if it was fine, “he tells them.
Saborido complained to his family that he He gave the condolences to Joaquín for his father on the phone And he didn’t even answer him. He complains that his daughter was who called the Civil Guard When Faura’s happened (the alleged crime of ill -treatment), which helped her and the character turned her back. “Flavor complains that Joaquín and her sister know it and that all that takes advantage of. And he says that with all that her sister does not call her. The man that Mediaset pays for going to her television justifies the fact of going to destroy her own sister if she does not call her. The very quiet awareness to go to television.
As far as we know, that call never occurred, and José finally sat down with Santi Acosta’s team to do an interview in which he talked about the alleged infidelities of his brother -in -law. Subsequently, his wife Nadine confirmed those statements. Now come back. But José’s credibility is scarce. With Nadine has also had serious discussions that have ended in complaint. All sources in Seville consulted in the environment of José confirm presumptions that converge: that has been “splashed by drug problems”, which supposedly “frequents premises of alternate” and until “unattendes the care of their children”, which puts even more in doubt his testimony about his sister’s marriage and, above all, he doubts the moral principles of those who give him voice and money in exchange for say TRUE.
