The great taste in the mouth still lasts after the exhibition on Tuesday. This time, the debate on massive rotations was won by Marcelino. Athletic was a cyclone penalized by the lack of aim above, a goalkeeper in a memorable performance and the deconcentration that caused a penalty. In previous days our mistakes in the end of the game made us lose points that were already in the bag; this time factors like these prevented us from taking a leap in the table.
A joy this Athletic. Also the realization that we can play differently: with spirit and ambition. With this one who plays big we are all, not so with the timid and speculator. Proven that we have more capabilities, we demand that in Anoeta: courage and go for the game.
We need a joy. Not being the most important game of the season, it can restore a lot of self-esteem after the image of the Cup final.
A shame Vivian’s discharge. Excellent his season so far. It is time to be calm and trust a Yeray who returns with the desire to vindicate himself and regain his position. The whole will win from this fight.
Assembly
Without wanting to extend myself, since days have already passed to take stock and analysis regarding the Assembly, it will be bad to stay that the teacher has a mania for them, to see ghosts where there are none, to consider that malevolent compromisers and conspirators from the old regime do ungovernable the Club.
Looking within, at the numerous absurdities perpetrated recently, at the lack of respect for the partner in making theoretical linear and equal contributions that later, calculator in hand, confirms that they are not, assuming that doing so is contravening the mandate received by the Assembly precedent doing a disservice to the Club and themselves. They are questions to internalize. If not, they will stay the same.
From the lectern there were many arguments as to why some of the “yes for the yes” point out the existence of the “no for the no.” Whoever votes does so freely based on how it is managed and what is proposed.
Whoever sells that the compromise partners do not want to help Athletic makes a wrong or manipulative reading. All partners being equal, equal contributions. The seat in San Mamés in spills of this type is not a differentiating element. A management mostly rejected during exercises should show that something is being done completely wrong.
Someone, when the ballot box does not reflect what they would like, points to a manipulated umpire who receives instructions on what to vote for from bad losers who continue to conspire. Before they argued that it was the Assembly of Urrutia. Now it is from Elizegi and the board does not get the endorsement of the delegates. Isn’t it easier to assume that things are not being done right?
A success to subtract uncertainties by announcing the non-presentation in the next elections. Not so celebrate them with a season about to start and with all the key decisions made by those who are not going to continue managing. Certain positions must be trusted by those who arrive, not those who leave. The elections will be late. It is an opinion.
If nothing goes wrong, here in seven days