What is the relationship between Felipe VI’s trip to Baqueira and that of Urdangarin (with his girlfriend)? Iñaki wanted to “get attention”

This is what Mariangel Alcázar says. First, it is striking that the King and Iñaki Urdangarin coincided in time at the Valle de Aran ski resort. “After six days Felipe VI has gone,” the journalist pointed out in Ana Rosa’s programso he ensures that both trips are related: “It’s obvious.”

He begins his story by assuring that “a visit by the king to Baqueira was prepared and Iñaki was notified to get his skis out of there and it is true that this explanation has some black hole”. And he reflects: “Why does he have to go on a Saturday or a Sunday when he can go on a Tuesday? Or he can send anyone.” And he argues: “If the King has gone, it is in some way to fit in with the station that he continues to maintain and continues to guard that house (la Pleta)”.

The journalist also raises another option: “That Iñaki had a bit of cheek and decided to go there without explanations and when he was there they told him ‘get out of there because you don’t do anything’. They arrived on February 11 and left the next day at noon They went for something specific or they were told to leave.”

Alcázar adds in the Telecinco microphones that neither the Kings nor the emeritus have visited La Pleta for 20 years. And he points out: “The then Dukes of Palma used it while they were married or lived in Barcelona.” And the image of Iñaki in Baqueira walking with his girlfriend? “He had clear intentions to attract attention,” ditch Alcázar.