The judge confirms the precautionary measures that prevent Ceferin from sanctioning the Super League

Judge Gil Garciaafter having listened to the parties involved in the Superliga Case on April 1, It will maintain the precautionary measures that prevent Ceferín and the national championships from taking any action against the founding clubs of the project. This has been confirmed by sources of Justice to AS. In addition, the judge declares FIFA, co-defendant, in a “procedural default situation” by not appearing at the hearing.

The founding clubs of the Super League maintain all legal security measures that prevent UEFA from taking action against them, such as being fined or expelled from European competitions. UEFA tried to knock them down in the preview, with the support of LaLiga and the RFEF, but the process continues with the current measures. The judge has summoned all the parties for June, where she will try for the second time an agreement between plaintiffs and defendants (she already tried unsuccessfully in the precautionary) and will analyze what evidence will be taken into account for the trial.

It will be next June 14, at 10:00 a.m., when UEFA, LaLiga and RFEF will face each other again with the Super League in court. It will be in the courts of Plaza Castilla and five objectives will be set: try to reach an agreement or transaction between the parties that puts an end to the process; examine the procedural issues that may hinder the continuation of the process and its termination by means of a sentence on the object; accurately fix the object of the process; propose and admit evidence if appropriate and examine the issues that may arise.

The UEFA-LaLiga-RFEF front defends that the object of the Superliga process is expired since there is no activity in the competition and that said project died as soon as it was born. But from the part of the clubs they defend that the Superliga is still alive and that the start-up of the competition has not started, pending sufficient legal guarantees to do so (which depends on this process). They defend that this is reflected in the documentation signed by all the teams and that these will be the steps to follow.