Shakira and her other fight for the Treasury: she has already deposited the 6.6 million euros that the Prosecutor’s Office demands from her

After acknowledging that he defrauded the Treasury between the years 2012 and 2014, it has been learned that Shakira has already deposited in court the 6.6 million euros that the Prosecutor’s Office demanded from her in his second case for alleged fraud against the Treasury, corresponding to 201.

This deposit will be deposited in the court until the case is resolved and will serve to cover possible financial responsibilities. let justice be established, as has been advanced The newspaper this Friday.

The aforementioned sources have indicated that Gerard Piqué’s ex made the deposit at the end of August, and it became known this week after on Monday the singer acknowledged a fraud to the Treasury of 14.5 million euros between 2012 and 2014, for which in addition to returning the defrauded fees, she agreed to pay a fine of 7.3 million and three years in prison that he will not serve in exchange for paying another 432,000 euros. The Colombian singer also has no criminal record.

In this second cause of the singer Session 53 for alleged fraud, still in the investigation phase in the courts of Esplugues de Llobregat (Barcelona)the Prosecutor’s Office claims a debt of 6,686,502 euros with the 2018 declaration of the Personal Income Tax (IRPF) and the Wealth Tax (IP).

Prosecutor’s complaint

The complaint from the prosecutor that originated this second case highlights that, being a resident in Spain, Milan and Sasha’s mother was obliged to pay taxes on all of her worldwide income regardless of where it was produced and what the residence of the payer was.

Instead, she “used a corporate framework, diverting income to companies domiciled in countries with low taxation and high opacity” to avoid paying the total amount due to her for these taxes.

The cause of 2011

Regarding this cause, the one from Barranquilla said in a statement this Monday: “From the substance to the form, the 2011 case is nonsense; Not only because I wasn’t even close to being a resident in 2011, but because they have made me pay for all the working capital for my tour. They have not taken into account the expenses I incurred and I ended up paying for my tour expenses twice. “There has been a kind of double taxation and they have imposed disproportionate fines on profits that did not exist.”