Rodolfo Sancho and Silvia Bronchalo breathe a sigh of relief: they rule out the death penalty or life imprisonment for Daniel

Rodolfo Sancho y Silvia Bronchalowho have shown strong disagreements during the defense of their son and have even waged a private war in the courts of Alcobendas (Madrid), almost ruled out the death penalty or life imprisonment for their son, Daniel. From Thailand, where they are currently on trial, they breathe a little easier, because even the family’s lawyer, media expert Marcos García-Montes, does not believe that the young chef will receive the maximum sentence. All following a few words from the Prosecutor’s Office.

First of all, García-Montes explained that they are satisfied with the performance of the president of the Court during the trial: “Before the trial we said that he had done magnificently well, with impartiality. He has demonstrated it, he said that the trial is the only moment in which evidence can be presented and which is subject to contradiction so that the parties can interrogate.

Regarding the prosecutor, he also said this Friday in We’ll see: “He publicly stated that it could not be proven that it was a planned crime, that he was not very satisfied and that he would rule out the death penalty or life imprisonment”.

He also clings to the words of the colonel in charge of the investigation: “He stated that there was multiple evidence but that ‘we tried to deceive Daniel’. And, what for him is more important: ‘The medical examiner said that the occipital skull wound…” was compatible with a fightso there would be no premeditated murder, the main mitigating circumstance for which Daniel could receive the maximum sentence.

At the same time, he spoke about the “expert evidence” that will be presented during the next sessions and that for his client is “fundamental.” “This must be connected with what has occurred and that is that the Prosecutor himself has already ruled out the death penalty, life imprisonment and we are talking about prison, we are dealing with reckless homicide or intentional homicide. It is the prosecutor, who is the one who accuses and the that he is going to interrogate, by the way,” García-Montes insisted on the matter.

Finally, after the statement by Sancho Gracia’s grandson was postponed, which was scheduled for this Thursday, April 25, he stated: “The news we have is that it will be day 1 [de mayo] because the president of the court has said that it will be very long, he prefers it to be that day”.

The trial against Daniel for the murder and dismemberment of the Colombian surgeon Edwin Arrieta It is located at the equator. This Thursday there was one of the most complicated sessions, so much so that it ended up being canceled due to the power outages suffered in the area and which affected the Koh Samui court, where they were left without air conditioning and faced temperatures exceeding 43 degrees. . The magistrate suspended the procedure, which will be resumed next Tuesday, when it is expected that the incidents will be resolved.