resounding victory for Harry in his battle against the British press: the newspapers hacked his cell phone, according to the judge

Intrusion of privacy. The newspapers hacked Harry's cell phone between 2004 and 2009 as part of a hacking strategy to extract data and information about his privacy. This is the conclusion reached by the judge of a London court, this Friday, December 15, to which he has had access The New York Times.

The magistrate has ruled in favor of the Duke of Sussex when considering that the Mirror Group Newspaper corporation, owner of several newspaper titles, had been part of a computer hacking that hacked the prince's mobile phone with the aim of extracting private information. illegal. This is what the judge estimated after evaluating all the evidence provided in the 15 of the 33 press articles that Harry presented in his lawsuit, as published The New York Times.

Meghan's husband was hacked over five years, between 2004 and 2009, with evidence of wiretapping. In the ruling, the group must compensate the youngest son of Carlos III with 140,600 pounds, about 163,000 euros, in damages.