Prince Andrew lied about his relationship with pedophile Epstein: the email that gives him away

Research that relates to prince andrew with the deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein triggered his withdrawal from royal functions in 2019. Although his mother died together with him and he has been present, in the background, in the most significant days of the British crown since the death of the sovereign, the truth is that nothing has been the same again and the English people do not see him, even remotely, with good eyes.

The Mirror He publishes new information this Friday that does not leave him in a good place either. They label him a liar for an email from Epstein that came to light this Friday and that would show that he saw Epstein more than once after his imprisonment in 2008, and not just once, as the prince assured in his BBC interview in November 2019. On that occasion, Andrés assured that they only saw each other in December 2010, when he visited him to, according to him, break their friendship.

However, in the aforementioned email, the pedophile would have written to a banker: “Andrés sat next to me at dinner.” This email is dated June 14, 2010, when Epstein was under house arrest. This new evidence, which the British press brings to light, would be so “obvious” that they say it is “the most damning” to date.

In February of last year, Prince Harry’s uncle paid a multi-million dollar amount to Virginia Giuffre, the woman who denounced him for sexual abuse in 2001 and directly involved him with Epstein. She did it to avoid being tried for sexual abuse. The plaintiff identified Andrés, the third of Isabel II’s children, as one of the men who took advantage of her after the mediation of the pedophile magnate.

In a letter to Judge Lewis Kaplan, Giuffre’s lawyers said Prince Andrew would make a “substantial donation” to Giuffre’s organization for victims of abuse. The text, collected by CNN, did not reveal the amount. Finally, Andrés was freed from legal conviction, but the scandal and its resolution imply a moral and media condemnation, and he will go down in history as the royal who (allegedly) abused minors.