Pizarro's decisions that still piss off the Real's dressing room

The Real Sociedad dressing room is still very angry with the performance of Pizarro Gómez in Mestalla. As the hours pass, the feeling increases that Valencia was able to tie them for the help of the refereeing decisions of the Madrid referee. The txuri-urdin players came back very pissed off from the Turia capital, claiming that the refereeing work was diminishing little by little until they ended up unhinged. Moreover, they do not understand how none of the controversial decisions of the party favored them, they all fell on the side of the rival.

In the club the mosqueo is great, but they have opted for silence with the refereeing work. No player has publicly commented on the referee's mistakes. And what you want is to turn the page. No one is going to raise their voices, much less raise a protest before him. Referees Technical Committee, despite feeling clearly harmed by what they understand a poor refereeing performance and not fair to both teams.

Four are, especially, the decisions of Pizarro Gómez that annoy the players of the Real, and they still do not understand. The first is Carlos Fernández's penalty to Gabriel Paulista. They understand that the Sevillian arrives with an advantage, clears the ball and then involuntarily steps on the Brazilian when he no longer had any option to play the ball. The second also has to see the central Valencia as the protagonist. They consider that he should have seen the second yellow in a very hard tackle and at the wrong time on Carlos Fernández. The referee looked the other way, and Paulista was decisive by scoring the final 2-2. He should not have scored because he should not have been on the field of play.

In addition, that play of the second goal, which came from a corner, should not have produced it either, because in the action that causes the corner kick there is a clear foul by Guedes on Le Normand. It shouldn't have been a corner. And the last one is a penalty not called on Alexander Isak, in an action similar to that of Paulista. They stepped on the Swede inside the Valencia area and took off his boot, but nobody appreciated anything. It was not even indirect free. Four actions that the Real believe were poorly appraised, which decisively harmed them and deprived them of having returned with the three points.