“Kate’s absence could be due to a pregnancy outside of marriage”: the false news about Guillermo and Rose Hanbury

At the beginning of last year we already dismantled Informalia a series of information related to William of England and the woman that certain media indicate as the alleged lover of the heir to the throne, Rose Hanbury. The former Marchioness of Cholmondeley is part of the hard core of the Princes of Wales, the aristocratic group with whom they have fun in the countryside. Married in 2009 with David Cholmondeleyis the mother of three children: twins Alexander Hugh y Oliver Timothy (who were pages of honor at the coronation of Charles III) and the small Iris.

Now we find the following news published on the Antena 3 website: “Kate Middleton’s absence could be due to a pregnancy outside of marriage”. This is how they put it on Susanna Griso’s program: “The collaborator of Public mirror “Nando Escribano brings to light one of the latest theories from the English media about the reason for Kate Middleton’s absence.”.

And they also write: “The information continues and news is published in which it is said that “Rose Hanbury’s daughter could actually be the result of her relationship with Prince William.”. At the same time, they take out a quote from Escribano: “Of course, in the United Kingdom an article that is published is an article that is deleted. Even so, there are still some articles from that time”. And they insist from the web: “When Kate undergoes abdominal surgery, rumors spread about the causes, but one of the theories is that Kate had been pregnant and the baby was not William’s..

Diving into the British media, none of the main tabloids relate certain statements to current information about the Princess of Wales. Neither him Daily Mailis The Mirroris Tatleris The Daily Telegraphis The Sun. Nor in Americans as in Page Six o TMZwhich usually provide cutting-edge information about members of the British royal family.

On other pages of lesser recognition and credibility such as Style Caster We do find some current references: “The truth about the father of Rose Hanbury’s daughter.” But in the summary, they already predict: “We do not believe this rumor about Prince William.”

In another article, published in Band of Outsiders, publish: “Is Rose Hanbury pregnant in 2024? Meet her children and husband.” And they explain, without talking about sources: “It is rumored that Lady Rose Hanbury is pregnant with Prince William’s child. Kate Middleton after finding out about the gossip is filing for divorce and keeping a low profile.”

In this article they also talk about Stephen Colbertrecogen, presenter of the American The Late Show, who said this Tuesday on his show: “There have been rumors of an affair between William and the Marching Band of Chicanery since 2019.” He added: “According to the tabloids at the time, when Kate supposedly confronted him about it, he laughed, saying he had nothing to do. It’s always a good response when your wife accuses you of being unfaithful.” The presenter, in a joking tone, did not hesitate and also said: “Ha ha, imagine having an affair! (…) It reminds me of a joke: knock, knock, who is there? Oh, it’s my illegitimate son. I got my lover pregnant”.

No other media takes such information for granted, which only fuels theories about what is really happening with George, Louis and Charlotte’s mother. Not very credible information that, in large part, is being fed by the disastrous communication strategy of the British Royal House, which still does not clarify what is happening to the future queen of England.

In mid-January they announced that he had undergone “abdominal surgery”, but since then everything has been a mystery. A mystery that leaves more and more questions, especially if we take into account that the institution has published a manipulated photo, supposedly by Kate herself.

The questions also increase if we compare. In this sense, communication about the illness and condition of Carlos III, who suffers from cancer, has been much more effective and transparent. Since his illness was reported (at the same time as Kate’s), we have seen the king in (real) images, participating in events and being clear in his communication (beyond the fact that he did not want to reveal the type of cancer he had). suffers).

However, the terrible communication of the British royalty regarding Kate should not justify or accept as valid certain statements, which were already denied and classified as fake news.