Jonathan Praena: “Everything the investigating judge says is false”

Status of the infected: “Luckily the whole expedition is fine, they have no symptoms of anything and we are waiting to give negative to leave for Madrid. Tomorrow we could go part of the expedition because, as the protocol of the Ministry of Health says, they have to be minimal Ten confined days since they test positive. The first ones, which tested positive on day six, will be able to leave tomorrow giving negative results. The rest, until ten days have passed after the positive test, will not be able to leave. “

Proposal by the examining judge to give up the match as lost to Fuenlabrada: “Honestly, it is based absolutely on nothing because everything it says is false. There is no point that is true, except one, that the City Council of La Coruña is not notified, but there is no obligation to communicate anything at the end of the A state of alarm. All the health powers of the Covid remain for the autonomous communities and we do not have to communicate anything to the City Council of La Coruña. It is the only thing that says well, the rest is all a lie. The ruling made by the examining judge is totally false Without foundation. We have until twelve in the morning to present allegations and those we are going to do, point by point and proving it documentary, which he has not done. “

Is LaLiga the one that says you have to travel ?: “What we tell LaLiga is that there is a game and that we are going to play. They do the pertinent investigations, they look at the protocol and talk about close contacts and epidemiological traceability. In the end they see that there are four people who have no contact in the day to day in the club. So LaLiga says that they are going to do a test as a precaution the next day and that we have to travel. We get on the plane and when we arrive, at about 17:45, they call us on laboratory and LaLiga saying that they have given six positive people. At the beginning there were eight, but then in the second review that the laboratory does, they stay at six. “

Play on Sunday: “This was expressed by the boys in the statement they made. In our first statement we were not in a position to know when we would be fine and when we could play, so we made that statement. There is a point where we have been criticized, in quotes, for saying that, in case the Competition Committee decided that the game could not be played or did not find a date, we were not going to protest. We did not want to harm another club or generate discomfort. The competent body has not said anything and with all the reports that we have, with the negatives that are already starting to appear, for that day we will have a template to play. The boys want to play it and I won't be the one to say that we don't play. “

Deportivo de La Coruña: “He is defending their interests. It is legal for him to use arguments to try to save the category. What I do not share is that they have to descend to another team in order for them to be saved. That is totally unfair. They know the LaLiga protocol. They are fighting what impossible, but to the point of meddling already on a political level … Feijóo saying that he is going to sue against us and LaLiga … “.

Campaign from Deportivo against Fuenlabrada?: “It is quite clear, not only in La Coruña. I think something strange behind the investigating judge because we have investigated and he appears out of nowhere between July 21 and 23, without having been named for the 19-20 season. In the end We believe that there is a set up plot that wants Fuenlabrada to descend and give Deportivo three points and end up saving. We are going to fight until the end because we have done absolutely nothing wrong or anything that has harmed any other club. “

Statement by Rodrigo Fernández Lovelle: “There being 46 people here who, if things were as Lovelle says, would be delighted to be able to testify and go against someone who has tried to play with their health and their lives … I would have liked the investigating judge to have I summoned 46 people to see if any said something that was different from what had happened instead of looking for a crack where it does not exist. My intention is not to discredit Lovelle, what I do not understand is because there must be a man calling everyone the media to try to dirty the image of the Fuenlabrada, I am not going to allow it. I am wishing that they make the declarations to us because he does not paint anything declaring “.

Can Lovelle's call be premeditated to benefit Deportivo and harm Fuenlabrada ?: “Of course. A man who is from Galicia, who also has representatives in Deportivo, who lives in Galicia and who is totally alien to the club … I consider that his testimony, in quotes, is irrelevant. Let him testify I'm not concerned, what I'm concerned about is the fact that they call him to testify. “

They may ask for the administrative descent: “We are prepared for any type of proposal made by the examining magistrate, but it will not be far from what they have put in this ruling. The Fuenlabrada has not done anything, LaLiga has told us what we had to do. The only thing we have done, unfortunately, it is contagious. We fear nothing because legally nobody can blame us. When there are issues that escape justice, it makes you uneasy, but to the point that we know that in some instance we are going to win because there is neither a single proof that Fuenlabrada has done something wrong. Tomorrow we will answer the examining magistrate and it will be quite clear. “

Do you believe in the independence of the Competition Committee ?: “I believe in justice and understand that the functions will be carried out well and will be professional enough not to be carried away by an investigating judge who searches where there is none.”