“For Errejón, Elisa was a hobby to entertain herself,” according to the actress’ lawyer

“There has been a moment when he has entered into a clear contradiction, that he has come out as best he could, that when he is asked about the issue of resignation, the judge asks him clearly and tells him: ‘But you, if you have not nothing, why are you resigning?’ And he says: ‘Of course, given the commotion that is created and my bosses are losing confidence in me because it is not coherent for a party that defends that all the testimonies of lives are valid… “, explained the lawyer Alfredo Arriendefense of Elisa Mouliáa. Errejón He explained that he resigned because he detected a lack of confidence: “I cannot defend myself based on the consistency that all the victims’ testimonies are valid, as I said,” Errejón declared before the judge.

Elisa Mouliaá “has answered everything,” her lawyer has revealed. “The judge has been especially inquisitive in his questions to her. In that hour and a half he has spoken much more, asking and cross-examining Elisa Mouliaá than he has with Errejón,” they said on the Sonsoles program. The lawyer says that in his statement, Errejón has uncovered “a duality between the educated boy, who looks like he hasn’t broken a plate, and a colder, slum person, who trivialized and dehumanized Elisa.”

“She had a more romantic perception and for me this was much more superficial,” said Errejón, according to the story of Elisa’s lawyer. “In other words, he came to say that it was a hobby to entertain himself and that he stayed with her that day because he had nothing better to do.”

Elisa’s defender maintains that “there is evidence that is going to be very illuminating.” Now the people who were at the party have to speak, because Errejón himself has said that it was “impossible” for him to have done what he is accused of having done without anyone seeing it. “We will see if those 8 or 12 people who were there, what they saw. Errejón maintains that it is impossible that what is said to have happened happened in the taxi without the taxi driver saying anything.”

The victim has justified before the judge the time that elapsed between the events and the complaint (three years): “Those of us who have experience treating victims know that it is common for them to first tell their friends and family what happened. , then they go into a ‘I don’t understand what happened’, then comes a phase of denial and, finally, depression,” explains the lawyer. “She went to the psychiatrist, the psychiatrist referred her to the psychologist and he is the one who made her re-emerge and become aware. In addition, he told her that until she was prepared to report, she should not do so,” says the lawyer.