FIFA threatens Atlético with a new punishment if it signs with ‘bridge assignments’

Atlético de Madrid may very well be punished by FIFA if it executes any signing within the impending summer season market and, subsequently, I determine to switch it to a different crew till January 2018, date on which it might already compete with the rojiblancos.

This case applies to the case of Vitolo. Atlético has an settlement with the Sevilla soccer participant and desires to tie him proper from time to time switch him to Las Palmas. The issue is that this selection is prohibited, because the specialised portal superior on Tuesday Iusport.

Atlético can’t give any participant as a result of, to take action, he should first register him within the Spanish Federation (RFEF) after which grant these federative rights to a different crew. With out step one, with out the registration within the RFEF (which is what FIFA has forbidden from doing), the second, the switch, can’t happen.

So, the rojiblancos research to seek out some recess to get it. There are a number of methods, as he informed yesterday EcoDiario.es.

One is to achieve an settlement with Sevilla in order that Vitolo will play in Pizjuán till January after which exit to Atlético in January. It appears unlikely.

One other is that Atlético pays Las Palmas the 40 million euros that the participant prices by way of a non-public contract, which Las Palmas signs Vitolo after which in January, Vitolo signs for Atlético.

An identical method is that Las Palmas assume the general value of the operation (with out 'credit score', or 'help' of Atlético) in order that Atlético will signal it for the aforementioned 40 million euros. This different is difficult as a result of it would jeopardize the wage and switch limits of Las Palmas.

The fourth different is that Atlético give the participant 40 million euros, and that he himself pays the rescission clause to, with out signing something with the rojiblancos, depart 6 months to Las Palmas after which be signed by Atlético in January . This different has as a drawback that the Treasury wouldn’t apply the exception for which such a revenue doesn’t apply to the IRPF, in order that the 'signing' could be round 60 million euros.

As well as, on this case (as within the earlier ones), FIFA threatens to punish Atlético for fraud of regulation. The lawyer Alberto Palomar mentioned yesterday at RNE that, at a minimal, the company would open a secure file to Atlético de Madrid. Neither is it dominated out that he investigated Las Palmas and the canaries may very well be sanctioned, making it tough for them to be concerned within the rojiblancos' plan.

This case would solely apply to the case of Vitolo, the one participant who would attain Atlético in January with a 'bridge task'. Sandro's signing is totally different. The participant, with a contract with Málaga till 2019, will stay there till January, when Atlético pays its clause. It’s a pact between Atlético, Málaga and Sandro that advantages all events.