Errejón explains what Elisa Mouliaá meant to him and Sonsoles Ónega is stunned when she hears it

The appearance of Íñigo Errejón before the judge in the case of alleged sexual assault on Elisha Moulia It has left surprising moments and unexpected revelations. On the Sonsoles Ónega program, the actress’s lawyer, Jorge Piedrafita, described in detail what happened during the interrogation and the politician’s statements. One of the most shocking moments, according to the lawyer, was the explanation that Errejón gave about his resignation at that time and his relationship with the political party to which he belonged: “There was a moment when he entered into a clear contradiction, which came out as best he could, that when he is asked about the issue of resignation, the judge asks him clearly and says: ‘But you, if you haven’t done anything, why are you resigning?’ And he says: ‘Of course,’. before the commotion that is set up and my bosses lose confidence in me because it is not coherent for a party that defends that all the testimonies of lives are valid…”, he revealed. Errejón He explained that he resigned because he detected a lack of confidence: “I cannot defend myself based on the consistency that all the victims’ testimonies are valid, as I said,” Errejón declared before the judge.

Elisa Mouliaá “has answered everything,” according to her lawyer. “The judge has been especially inquisitive in his questions to her. In that hour and a half he has spoken much more, asking and cross-examining Elisa Mouliaá than he has with Errejón,” he said on the Sonsoles Ónega program. The lawyer says that in his statement, Errejón has uncovered “a duality between the educated boy, who looks like he hasn’t broken a plate, and a colder, slum person, who trivialized and dehumanized Elisa.”

“She had a more romantic perception and for me this was much more superficial,” said Errejón, according to the story of Elisa’s lawyer. “I mean, he came to say that it was a hobby to entertain himself and that he stayed with her that day because he had nothing better to do.”

Elisa’s defender maintains that “there is evidence that is going to be very illuminating.” Now the people who were at the party have to speak, because Errejón himself has said that it was “impossible” for him to have done what he is accused of having done without anyone seeing it. “We will see if those 8 or 12 people who were there, what they saw. Errejón maintains that it is impossible that what is said to have happened happened in the taxi without the taxi driver saying anything.”

The victim has justified before the judge the time that elapsed between the events and the complaint (three years): “Those of us who have experience treating victims know that it is common for them to first tell their friends and family what happened. , then they go into a ‘I don’t understand what happened’, then comes a phase of denial and, finally, depression,” explains the lawyer. “She went to the psychiatrist, the psychiatrist referred her to the psychologist and he is the one who made her re-emerge and become aware. In addition, he told her that until she was prepared to report, she should not do so,” says the lawyer.