Elisa Mouliaá accuses Errejón of refusing to deliver her mobile but the former deputy explains it otherwise

News in the case of Elisa Mouliáa contra Iñigo Errejón. After the declaration of both in the judicial headquarters, the instruction phase continues in which the judge in charge, Adolfo Carretero, has ordered the delivery of the mobile terminals of both the actress and the former spokesman to add in Congress to be investigated by the Police. However, Elisa said Tuesday that the former founder of Podemos has refused to do so and his defense has resorted to the car.

Actress Elisa Mouliaá has written this in her X account (formerly Twitter): “Iñigo Errejón refuses to give her phone to the police.” He assures that the defense of Íñigo Errejón has resorted to the car by which he is required to contribute his phone to the police, claiming that “it is not a motivated car” and that he does not want to present it because “there is a risk of violating other fundamental rights.” If you confirm what Mouliaá says, the alleged refusal of Íñigo Errejón to deliver his mobile phone to the police would generate a new debate in public opinion, but the version of the defense of the former deputy is another: they have resorted to the judicial order that requires them to contribute The device, arguing that it is not properly motivated and that the delivery could violate other fundamental rights. This situation is part of the complaint for alleged sexual assault filed by the actress.

Elisa Mouliaá filed a complaint with the family and women’s care unit (UFAM) of the National Police, in which she accuses Errejón of having sexually assaulted her in September 2021. According to her story, after attending the presentation of a book From the politician, both went to a party, where Errejón, allegedly, kissed her and touched without her consent on several occasions. The actress argues that, at a given time, she took her to a room, closed the door with a pestillo and began kissing her and touching her without her consent. Mouliaá affirms that he felt “paralyzed” and that he did not agree at any time the actions of the former deputy.

After these facts, Mouliaá decided to report, although it took three years to do so. As he explained, this delay was due to recommendations of his psychologist and the fear for Errejón’s political position. However, after knowing other anonymous complaints against the politician, he decided to take the step and present his testimony publicly. In response to the complaint, Errejón’s defense has requested that Mouliaá contributes evidence, such as WhatsApp messages, psychiatric reports and witness contact data. The actress has assured that she has facilitated some of these data and that others are irrelevant to the case. In addition, he has expressed his willingness to deliver WhatsApp messages in an official event and his psychiatric records later.

Errejón’s refusal to deliver his mobile phone has been criticized by Mouliaá and his legal representatives, who consider that the device could contain relevant information for research. For its part, the defense of the former deputy argues that the delivery of the mobile could violate fundamental rights and that the judicial order that requires it is not properly motivated.

This case has raised a broad debate on the protection of fundamental rights within the framework of a judicial investigation and the importance of guaranteeing a fair process for both parties. While the investigation continues, public opinion remains attentive to the development of events and the decisions made by the judicial authorities in relation to this case.