Casemiro is not Oyarzabal

That for the arbitration establishment each game is a different world has once again been made clear on the last day of the year. That the old suspicion that dispensing justice at the Santiago Bernabéu is not the same as directing a match at any other La Liga stadium has gained momentum again. housemiro was booked with a slight yellow as a result of a spectacular tackle on Alejo at Real Madrid-Cádiz, similar in terms of harshness to the one he committed Oyarzabal a Pino at Real-Villarreal the previous day. It cost the captain txuri urdin the expulsion and that was the way it had to be, as the protagonist himself admitted. The ‘scissors’ of housemiro brings to light the classic controversy of the double standards that flies over in a competition in which it is obvious that the measures cease to be unanimous in a certain frequency.

Jaime Latre wrote in the minutes that housemiro he saw the yellow card for a “reckless” tackle. The Brazilian went after the Cádiz player, forgot the ball and could injure the rival in an objectively dangerous action. The fine thread between crossing out this lack of “recklessness” with the “excessive use of force” that Figueroa Vazquez warns in its minutes about the expulsion of Oyarzabal attend to dubious reasons. They are sister cousins ​​fouls, very similar, both deserving of a red card, but Casemiro is not Oyarzabal and the Bernabéu is not Anoeta.

The Competition Committee aims to sanction Oyarzabal with a match, since the text that Figueroa collected in the official match file is exactly the same as the one described by the red to Aritz Elustondo against Valencia. The Beasain center-back was sanctioned with a second game for throwing the ball into the stands, in an angry attitude, on his way to the locker room. Oyarzabal He did not incur this kind of reaction and will only miss, in principle, the game on Sunday, January 2, at the Alavés field.