Agur to Europe of Athletic?

After the ridicule of Granada, more than one should take note about the absurdity of recent weeks. I don’t think it is the fundamental cause of what was perpetrated in Los Cármenes, but after the embarrassment, anyone could reflect on whether we are really up to the task, from the fans to the dressing room. How much energy focused on debating the name of Athletic’s bench occupant for next season!

With Europe at stake, contacts with future prospects before the current coach. This one stirs spitefully. Without expressing his desire, he holds on to the contracting party’s move. And the person responsible for the fact that there is no contracting party, in profile and delaying the electoral date. And the press conferences, focused on the topic. With what was at stake. Not to mention the role of some.

Meanwhile the most important thing, the points, for Granada. Was the team really up to what it occupied and worried about, the present, or things to come?

read also

We debate before the elections are called about what should not be the subject of debate or in elections, dating them when they do the least damage. The coach would be hired by the president-elect, never after being part of a raffle and auction of names. The work team would be formed after knowing what there is and the shortcomings that the house had and with time to decide on hiring, leaving, leaving and entering, not with a preseason almost started, expired contracts and dispensing with who is not even known how they work for bring others whose names give votes.

It was avoidable by calling the elections at another time. We have a coach-themed circus for a while, unfortunately.