If we exclude the tragedy that the death of her father logically meant for her two and a half years ago, Tamara Falcon He has had to face this week the worst moment of his life. The tears in her heart are of a different nature, as are the types of love towards a father or towards whom she considered the man of her life. Carlos Falco He was 83 years old but he was in good health and it was the Covid that took him, like so many people. Above that there is nothing. Except for another death.
The relationship with Íñigo It smells It’s not that she was healthy, it’s that she was about to snow: statement, engagement, ring and wedding date. We suggest recovering the scenes from the first season of Tamara’s series on Netflix to gauge the extent of her admiration and level of infatuation with the one who now looks like the Devil, even though he doesn’t have the horns.
In March 2020, another Marchioness of Griñón, the then consort of Carlos Falcó, also suffered a loss, in her case that of her husband, Tamara’s father. The aristocrat’s widow regained love with Santiago Pedraz and also proclaimed to the four winds their commitment, no less than on the cover of the magazine Hola, an announcement that was born when it was no longer true. The scandal, very different, unites the Marquise and the widowed Marquise of Griñón much to their regret.
Both said they were happy and in love, both shared their respective marriage commitments with all of Spain, both expressed their happiness and joy at having found love and for announcing their respective weddings and showing off their rings. Both saw their hopes and plans amputated, both became the center of national gossip. Their recent and eventful sentimental stories are not lacking in common.
Capricious fate has wanted that, barely a month before the Tamara and Onieva scandal, Esther Doña’s vaunted marriage commitment to Judge Pedraz drowned in the waters of Ibiza after a monumental brawl.
But if the facts are similar, in what happened, in the times, in the media virulence of their soap operas, and in the family closeness that unites (despite not treating) both forties (they take only three years), the differences are very significant.
What has been heavier: Tamara’s or Esther’s? The Onieva thing took it up to the TV news
Time relativizes everything, and these ephemeral things go from seeming the center of Creation to just another anecdote. But if we go back to moved of Esther and Pedraz, and we return to those days (in the middle of August!), we will remember that it was intense to the point of cloying. However, the media explosion carried out much to his regret by the daughter of Isabel Preysler has surpassed that of Esther Doña. up in the Newscast of La 1 have managed these days to get on the bandwagon of Tamaronieva gatewith the excuse of reports such as ‘infidelity, a social concept?’, consulting experts, and that, as if without getting their hands dirty with gossip, but using the marchioness as a hanger and taking their images in the news, and in various editions. With Esther and Pedraz they didn’t dare that much.
But that is precisely the second and very important difference: infidelity and deception. Pedraz, as far as we know, was not unfaithful to Esther, and that was not because of the abrupt breakup, via whatsapp, sino a monumental row between the magistrate and the widow, in which they say that he remembered the night in which his friend Carlos Falcó ended up sleeping in a dungeon after a strong argument with the Malaga salerosa at the Eurobuilding hotel. Another thing is that, after learning of the annulment of the commitment between the judge and the model, supposed foolishness of her has been published.
Also read: The reason for Judge Pedraz’s scare to leave Esther Doña
The money, the exclusives and the fight with Hello
Esther Doña wanted to get money by selling her engagement in an exclusive that was embarrassing. Tamara Falcó did not sell the exclusive of her commitment to Hola, as if he did his stepmother, Esther Dona, Unfortunately for the magazine, which had to give explanations after it came to light that the commitment announced in full sail on the front page was false and that Pedraz had left his girlfriend days before the weekly newspaper’s newsstand.
On Thursday, September 22, Tamara Falcó published her engagement to Iñigo Onieva on Instagram. She was “the happiest woman in the world,” she said. And she exhibited the ring of 14,500 euros that the supposed man of her life had given her, but she did it for free. And thanks to this nobody could blame him for announcing a falsehood, as happened with Doña. Nevertheless, Tamara has also experienced two disagreements with Hola, the magazine of his family, especially his mother. First, because the publication would have wanted to give the commitment on the cover, as an exclusive; and, second, because after the breakup, Tamara spoke for the first time Save me and then at a press conference in a Photocall. Seen now, perhaps Tamara did the magazine a favor, that, if she had given the commitment on her cover, she would have seen it annulled at the moment, like Doña’s. The fame of jinxed magazine would have already been inevitable.
bad guys in the movie
The there you stay via WhatsApp de Pedraz to Falcó’s widow was able to imply at first that the the bad guy from the film it was the judge. But then details were known, which pointed to Esther Dona as guilty, insinuating her flirtations with a businessman, never confirmed, or even the aforementioned anger in which she allegedly had words against her boyfriend that forced him to break up. What became clear is that the liar, the one who deceived the magazine (and the whole world) and inexplicably pretended that she was still with Pedraz was Esther. But in this case there was no place as clear as in the case of Tamara and Onieva. The information that did not leave Iñigo Onieva in a good place grew in crescendo: the video, the denial, the embarrassing apology via statement, Tamara’s appearances despising her ex-fiancé, the data on her fattened resume and, above all, the feeling that there were more infidelities and more images have sunk Onieva even deeper than the pathetic Esther Doña. A joint appearance of both in a pathetic contest would be extraordinary.
The losers
Now, Tamara and Judge Pedraz continue with their lives and their jobs but Íñigo Onieva may lose his and Esther Dona little is known but it will not be easy to sell exclusives because she is the lying shepherdess. “For me, work is super important. A fundamental pillar. If I’m doing badly emotionally, I’m not going to let it affect me,” said the Marchioness of Griñón after the sentimental bump. And it has been consistent. On Tuesday the 27th she attended the Teatro Real for the presentation of Kronos Homes, He also attended his appointment on Thursday at the Hormiguero. She has also traveled to Mexico, to the XIV World Congress of Families in Mexico as a speaker at a conference. She will give her talk at the Expo Bancomer Santa Fe in Mexico City. And now she will finish the second part of her documentary on Netflix, whose audience will skyrocket, in addition to the viewings that the first part adds as a result of the scandal. Tamara for ever.
A friend told us days ago that he had dreamed of Tamara getting married to Pedraz and that he woke up startled by the nonsense that his own subconscious had given him, no doubt troubled by reading so much gossip. However, reality is always stranger than fiction. Ask Tamara and Esther Doña. Yes three months ago Rappel He would have ensured that the daughter and the fourth wife of the Marquis de Griñón were going to announce their engagements and break them, almost at the same time, they would probably have tarred him, feathered him and expelled him from the country. What’s next?
Facebook
Twitter
Linkedin